A French trader was reported to have made more than $85 million on Polymarket. Here’s what the record shows.

Bloomberg and Chainalysis printed more than $85 million across as many as 11 accounts. The four named profiles still exist. The pages do not agree on the dollar, and a reader cannot copy the trade.
By Jordan NabigonPublished 8 min read
What to take away
- Bloomberg (7 Nov 2024, Yahoo syndicate opened this run): Chainalysis research seen by Bloomberg — as many as 11 accounts may be the same trader; expected profit more than $85 million; username Fredi9999.
- The four accounts Polymarket investigated — Fredi9999, Theo4, PrincessCaro, Michie — still have public profiles (opened 16 Aug 2026). NY Post (6 Nov 2024) printed $48 million on those four, attributed to the platform.
- Fox printed closer to $84 million and an unconfirmed 11th address. Sherwood’s $79 million paraphrase is not on the Bloomberg wire we opened. Do not average.
- A reader cannot copy the fill, the fee path, the four-to-eleven map, or the next event. 2026 cluster P&L is UNKNOWN.
On 7 November 2024, Bloomberg — the full wire, opened this run as the Yahoo syndicate reprint, byline Emily Nicolle, 5:14 PM UTC, ©2024 Bloomberg L.P. — printed that research from Chainalysis, “seen by Bloomberg News,” had newly linked a network of accounts to the trader best known as Fredi9999. “As many as 11 accounts may be operated by the same trader.” “The total profit he is expected to have made now amounts to more than $85 million.” That is their count, not ours.
The same wire printed the earlier number that most recaps started from: Bloomberg had calculated a $48 million profit on the four accounts then publicly attributed to Fredi9999.
Those four names are on the pages. Business Insider, 24 October 2024: Fredi9999, Theo4, PrincessCaro, Michie. One trader, Polymarket told DealBook. “$45 million in open positions as of Thursday morning.” Forbes, the same day, printed a different object: a combined $28.6 million on Trump election bets, “according to CNBC.” That is a position size, not a profit, and we did not open CNBC.
Polymarket’s investigation, as those rooms printed it, found a French national with “extensive trading experience and a financial services background,” taking “a directional position based on personal views of the election,” and no identified attempt to manipulate the market. Business Insider added that the trader agreed “not to open further accounts without notice.”
The man who spoke called himself Théo. The Wall Street Journal interview — opened this run as the To Vima reprint — is the page that has him on a Zoom call. “My intent is just making money.” “I have absolutely no political agenda.” To prove he was the whale, the Journal asked him to bet a small non-political market (Taylor Swift pregnancy in 2024). Minutes later, it printed, Theo4 had placed that bet.
He told the Journal he started in August on Fredi9999, then opened the other three accounts in September and October because other traders backed away from quoting when Fredi9999 was buying. The Fredi9999 profile we opened on 16 August 2026 prints Joined Jun 2024. We are not going to pick a third month.
He also told the Journal the $30 million was the majority of his liquid assets, and that a Harris win could take most or all of it. The Journal wrote that it could not confirm all the elements of his story, could not verify the own-money claim, and could not rule out links to a political organization. Those sentences stay in the piece. They are the record.
Then the election resolved, and the rooms stopped agreeing on the dollar.
On 6 November 2024 the New York Post printed $48 million “according to the crypto-based betting platform”: Theo4 “about $22 million,” the other three “a combined $26 million.” On 7 November Bloomberg printed more than $85 million on as many as 11 accounts, and Business Insider restated that pair. Fox Business, 9 November, printed closer to $84 million and quoted a Chainalysis X post we did not open: a 10th address to $83.5 million, an 11th “suspected” at another $2.1 million, “unconfirmed.” Sherwood, the same day as Bloomberg, wrote that Bloomberg had said “approximately $79 million.” That $79 million is not on the Bloomberg wire we opened. We will not launder it into a house average.
Adam Hart of Chainalysis, in the Bloomberg wire, said ten of the accounts cashed out to two exchange accounts, “strongly indicating a shared owner,” and that an 11th shared similar patterns. “May be” is the verb on the page. It is not a caption that says proven.
The public profiles still exist. We opened them on 16 August 2026, 9:56 AM EDT.
Fredi9999: joined Jun 2024, 86.1 thousand views, positions $0.00, biggest win $9.7 million, 45 predictions, no positions found. Theo4: joined Oct 2024, 305.6 thousand views, biggest win $8.3 million, 14 predictions. PrincessCaro: joined Sep 2024, biggest win $3.3 million, 14 predictions. Michie: joined Oct 2024, biggest win $2.6 million, 13 predictions. All four showed $0.00 positions value.
The all-time profit leaderboard we opened the same hour printed different single-account numbers: Theo4 +$22,053,934 (rank 2), Fredi9999 +$16,619,507 (rank 3), PrincessCaro +$6,083,643 (rank 17). Michie was not in the visible top 20. Those are all-time rows on 16 August 2026. They are not a 2024-election-only cluster total, and adding them up is not a method we will use to invent an $85 million confirmation.
The addresses the leaderboard printed next to those names: Fredi9999 0x1f2dd6d473f3e824cd2f8a89d9c69fb96f6ad0cf; Theo4 0x56687bf447db6ffa42ffe2204a05edaa20f55839; PrincessCaro 0x8119010a6e589062aa03583bb3f39ca632d9f887. Michie’s hex was not on the page we opened.
If you came here because a thread treated one username as an $85 million screenshot, the useful move is smaller than picking a side. Name the object. Four accounts that Polymarket said were one trader is one object. Eleven addresses Chainalysis said may be the same trader is another. $48 million on 6 November is a platform-attributed four-account figure. More than $85 million on 7 November is a Chainalysis-via-Bloomberg expected total. A 2026 leaderboard row is a third object. Most addresses on this venue are not in realized profit — 15.9% in Sergeenkov’s all-address cut through 1 April 2026, about 30% in other public cuts — and a named whale does not rewrite that literature.
What a reader cannot copy
You cannot copy the fill. Théo told the Journal he was already large enough to be “effectively stuck.” The four accounts, in that interview, held about 25% of the Trump Electoral College contracts and over 40% of the popular-vote contracts (Polymarket Analytics, as printed). That book is closed.
You cannot copy the fee path. What this cluster paid in spread, gas, or taker fees is UNKNOWN. A Yes+No sum that looks like a dollar is still not a lock. Complementary prices add toward a dollar of collateral before spread, size, two orders, and fees. The ebook line is the same sentence: a $1 screenshot is not a lock.
You cannot copy the account map. Polymarket signed off on four names. Chainalysis, via Bloomberg, said as many as eleven may be the same. The 11th is unconfirmed on the Fox page. We did not open a Chainalysis paper.
You cannot copy the next event. The 2024 presidential winner contract is not the contract on the screen tonight. Current 2026 cluster P&L is UNKNOWN.
This is not a system. It is a set of pages, with dates, that do not agree on the dollar.
Editorial review
Reviewed by Jordan Nabigon on 16 August 2026.
How AI was used here
Research packet, draft, reviewer/editor pass under 2026-08-15 auto-approve standing order.
Sources
- New Analysis Boosts Trump Whale’s Polymarket Haul to $85 Million primaryBloomberg L.P. via Yahoo News syndicate · retrieved 16 August 2026
- Polymarket 'Whale' Placing Big Bets on a Trump Win Is a French National primaryBusiness Insider · retrieved 16 August 2026
- The Polymarket 'whale' actually made $85 million, far more than originally thought primaryBusiness Insider · retrieved 16 August 2026
- Who Is Polymarket’s Trump Whale? Site Reveals French Trader Bet $28 Million On Trump Win primaryForbes · retrieved 16 August 2026
- Election 'whale' bettor made much more on Trump win than originally thought primaryFox Business · retrieved 16 August 2026
- Polymarket 'whale' who bet on Trump raked in $48M in profits primaryNew York Post · retrieved 16 August 2026
- The French Polymarket whale won so much money that France is investigating the platform strong_secondarySherwood News · retrieved 16 August 2026
- The Trump-Betting Whale Speaks Out: ‘I Have Absolutely No Political Agenda’ primaryWall Street Journal via To Vima · retrieved 16 August 2026
- Polymarket profile @fredi9999 primaryPolymarket · retrieved 16 August 2026
- @theo4 primaryPolymarket · retrieved 16 August 2026
- @PrincessCaro primaryPolymarket · retrieved 16 August 2026
- @Michie primaryPolymarket · retrieved 16 August 2026
- Leaderboard overall / all / profit primaryPolymarket · retrieved 16 August 2026
Read next
- How many Polymarket wallets are in profit — and why 16% and 30% are both in the literature
Sergeenkov’s all-address cut through 1 April 2026 is 15.9% in realized profit. DeFi Oasis and a Reichenbach & Walther author note sit near 30%. The difference is mostly method. None of these is an “active trader” rate.
- Why the Number on the Screen Is Not Always the Number You Can Trade
The displayed price is often a midpoint. Buyers pay the ask. Taker fees apply on many categories. A Yes+No sum that looks like $1 can still not be a lock.
- Why Complementary Prices Should Add Up to About a Dollar
Yes and No are two sides of one dollar of collateral. A sum under $1 or over $1 is a fact about complementary prices — before fees, spread, and fill risk — not a verdict that the event is wrong.
